Thanksgiving thoughts

Los Angeles, California 

As a kid, I spent a lot of time indoors surrounded by books, as anyone who has seen me attempt any outdoor pursuits will implicitly realise.

And chief among them was a Rand McNally encyclopaedia of American states.

The rich history and geography of this diverse place – imagery of bears and bison, cowboys and Indians, pioneers and pilgrims – were just as magical to me as anything conjured up by Tolkien or C.S. Lewis.

Later, as a student of political philosophy, I became acquainted with America’s founding fathers not as the fabled men with powdered wigs and pink cheeks in my picture books, but as some of the most important writers and thinkers ever to advance the causes of liberty and freedom. 

As a result, travelling this vast land – meeting its people and reconciling what I had read with real tales of my very own – became a life goal.

Sitting here at LAX about to depart for home, turkey sandwich and cranberry juice on the table before me in a nod to tradition on this Day of Thanks (or as close as I can get in an airport lounge), it is a goal I can satisfyingly say is now firmly achieved.

In particular, I am thankful for the following highlights:

  • Driving more than 20,000 miles from east to west, north to south.
  • Listening to speeches by a Pope, two Presidents and a President-Elect
  • Jumping and jiving at SXSW, Lollapalooza and Burning Man
  • Spectating multiple college football, NFL, NHL and MLB games
  • Taking in the serenity at Yellowstone, Yosemite and Arches National Parks
  • Cheating death while hiking in the Rockies (and tailgating in College Station)
  • Mustering cattle in the Texas Hill Country
  • Hunting for gators with swamp guides in the Louisiana bayou
  • Off-roading (by accident) in the desert expanses of Utah
  • Door-knocking for a political campaign in rural Montana
  • Testifying at an African-American church in Natchez, Mississippi
  • Picking cotton and listening to blues in the deep south
  • Hosting a conference of Aussie execs in Silicon Valley
  • Covering the Libertarian National Convention with MegaCon nerdfest next door
  • Hours of live action from the gallery while working in the US Congress
  • Observing the Olympics and Super Bowl from a very different vantage point
  • Chronicling Colorado’s thriving recreational marijuana industry 
  • Live-blogging the final 72 hours of a presidential election
  • Ingesting more sugar, salt and plastic orange cheese than should be permissible by law
  • Hanging out with childhood chums in New York City
  • Spending quality time with my great aunt, her children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

These are just a few of the delightful memories of a year and a half well spent, some of which made it into this thread, while others were overshadowed by opinion pieces and political rants which I hope have been of value.

On that note, sincere thanks to all of those that read these posts over the past 18 months, your continued clicks made all the research and effort (not to mention significant debt and pending litigation) all the more worthwhile.

And sincere thanks also to my dear American family and friends. For all of the conclusions and analyses contained throughout this thread, one is more certain than all of the others:

American hospitality is alive and well.

Happy Thanksgiving and cheers for having me.


Pilgrims’ Partners

Plymouth, Massachusetts

When, in 1620, the pilgrims disembarked the Mayflower on this salty outcrop of New England, I’m sure they couldn’t possibly imagine the global superpower that would one day sprout from their quaint little colony.

Given that their mission was to establish a puritan utopia morally superior to the perceived debauchery of the Europe they fled, I wonder whether they would be proud or ashamed of the nation they gave birth to.

On the one hand, the United States has been immensely successful – and what parent doesn’t want to see their offspring achieve financial independence and maturity? It has also kept up with many of the protestant traditions and moral inquiries the ‘Brownist separatists’ – as the pilgrims were known at the time – inspired, at least compared to their godless cousins in Old Europe, and has often come to the aid of neighbours and allies facing hardship or oppression.

On the other hand, it is also home to Kim Kardashian and Kaitlyn Jenner, and just chose a casino and beauty pageant mogul to be its leader.

Regardless of whether they would be proud, it is clear that many Americans are proud of them and of the history that followed. Putting to one side the problematic issue of relations with the indigenous population – which I wrote about this time last year – the pilgrims reflected that very American proposition that individuals determine their own destiny and excellence should always be strived for.

Here by the famous rock where those first settlers once stood, I am struck once again by the fact that Australia’s founding could not be more different.

Bound in chains as convicts or simply carrying out their orders as officers of the British Empire, the first European settlers of the Land Down Under were not interested in establishing a nation of any kind – let alone one that was morally pure.

Should they be given the same opportunity to assess the performance of their descendants, they would probably respond with a characteristically Aussie shrug of the shoulders, though they may indeed be proud that we haven’t lost our appetite for gambling and booze (not sure they would approve of Baird’s lockout laws however).

The importance of these very different foundational stories cannot be overstated. It explains much about our respective national characters – like how Aussies are suspicious of overly successful people and cringe at singing their own anthem, while Americans do not flinch at reaching for the stars or reciting a daily pledge of allegiance.

These differences can lead some Aussies to a knee-jerk anti-Americanism at times, put off by the strong sense of American identity, the religious adherence and devotion to traditional values from much of the population and the steely focus on work and money.

We saw that sentiment on display often in the past weeks, as foreign observers denigrated Americans for their election gamble. This came not only from social media but even from Australia’s alternative government.

Shadow foreign affairs minister Penny Wong suggested that in light of the Trump victory a pivot away from the US alliance might be warranted.

She could not be more wrong.

Since federation, Australia’s security in the region has been largely reliant upon its alliance with the world’s superpower. Australia’s instinctive apathy and easy-going lifestyle makes it easy to forget that, as a relatively small population inhabiting an island blessed with an enviable honeypot of natural resources (and with far more populous and less lucky neighbours to consider), security is not something we should be complacent about.

Embracing and engaging our Asian neighbours is smart policy, but ultimately we share more with the United States culturally than almost any other country.

We are inherently New World nations, where parentage and accent matter less than character and ability. We believe inherently in people power and democratic rule, even though that conviction may be under threat.

Moreover, even where we don’t see eye to eye, it wouldn’t hurt for Australia to adopt a slightly more American attitude on some issues.

For example, a greater focus on risk-taking and entrepreneurship would do wonders for our global competitiveness and the health of our business community and living standards. A greater scepticism of government would unleash the power of voluntary, charitable and community endeavours and enrich Australian society.

This doesn’t mean we need to swap our surfboards for shotguns, or rush out and cancel Medicare, but there is much we can learn from the US if we look beyond the caricature and our instinct to cut down tall poppies.

In 2015, former Australian PM Julia Gillard proclaimed that we are entering the ‘Asian Century’, with the subtle implication that the post-WWII age of American hegemony is over.

Over the past 18 months, Donald Trump echoed this fear of decline with his successful ‘Make America Great Again’ mantra.

But overall, my assessment is that while the fears are real and palpable – aided by a hysterical US news media – the outlook is far more positive. America’s culture of innovation, its creativity and dynamism remain unrivalled and its global influence will endure well into the near future.

Pilgrims and convicts are fundamentally different, but they can still be mates. I hope that mateship will continue, irrespective of electoral ups and downs and united in the belief that the world is a better place when it is both brave and free.

Now that is a goal worth pledging allegiance to.

Image source: J Russell Janishian Gallery 

Published on 23 November 2015

Campaign Conclusions

New York City

On election night a week ago, I tried hard to stick to the facts, with no shortage of opinionated content available to those following at home. But I’d be lying if I said that as the result became clearer I wasn’t overcome by a sense of unease.

Unease because the man just elected to the world’s most powerful office is untested; unease because he has consistently demonstrated poor character; and unease because I’m not convinced this is the solution to the deep divisions I have documented throughout this thread.

These are the reasons I would not have voted for Trump. But obviously my sense of discomfort was mild compared to the sheer hysterics that would follow the announcement – the social media meltdowns, the cancelling of classes for “traumatised” students, the hyperbolic comparisons of Trump to history’s greatest villains.

Some of this response is understandable, given the aggressive campaign the president-elect ran to get there. But it is also based on myths, generalisations and even prejudice, fuelled by a news media and political elite that was desperate to maintain its grip on power.

The most common of these is that, having voted for a man that has made inflammatory remarks regarding illegal immigrants and Muslim Americans and often treated women disgustingly, his supporters must therefore also be racists and misogynists.

The charge is both untrue and offensive to millions of people. Like every country, there is a racist element within American society and that niche group of people with abhorrent views was vocally supportive of Trump. But they are small in number and largely inhabit safely Republican states. It was not these people that made the difference in Tuesday’s election.

Instead, Trump’s victory hinged on working and middle class people in northern (non-Confederate) states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin – people that voted for Barack Obama twice.

I realise the definition of racism these days is broad and subjective, but people who vote for a black man to be their president are quite simply not racist.

The misogyny thesis is also unsupported by the facts. According to Pew Research, 42 per cent of American women voted for Trump – that is only two percentage points lower than Mitt Romney received in 2012 and roughly on par with the support Republicans usually get. I know it is difficult for many liberal, city-dwelling women to comprehend, but that is millions upon millions of adult females who knowingly voted for an anti-feminist pariah. Surely true feminism requires us to respect the independent decision making processes of these women and try to understand it, rather than accusing them of hating themselves and being pawns for the global patriarchy.

Finally – and most disturbingly – a common explanation has been they simply must be stupid. I have heard no shortage of comments suggesting if only we could raise education standards then maybe these silly, ignorant, downtrodden fools would become enlightened and vote correctly. It displays a shocking lack of respect for the values and intelligence of millions of people – especially since so much of this argument comes from people that claim to be advocates for the working poor.

So the question is: if they are not racist, sexist or simply ignorant, how then did rational beings vote for someone with no political experience and an endless list of scandals and controversies?

The answer is threefold.

First, considerable blame can be placed on the alternative ticket. Hillary Clinton is an impressive woman who has worked tirelessly throughout her life to achieve the things she has and has put some mighty cracks in the glass ceiling. But she is also symbolic of America’s permanent political class. When voters went into the polling booth on November 8 they didn’t see gender – they saw Hillary Clinton and the corrupt political machine she and her husband lead.

While the international press portrayed this election simply as ‘psychopath against female’, the American people were forced to do their own journalism and look more deeply at the person who would be the first woman president. For many, her suspicious destruction of classified information and her acceptance of millions of dollars in donations from foreign dictators and Wall Street bankers (despite her stated feminist and Keynesian ideals) was all too much.

They ultimately made a call that corruption is a worse crime than offensive speech – something the media would have once agreed with.

Second, that frustration was not only with the Clintons, but with the cult of power they belong to. Trump was unprecedented in a number of ways but perhaps the most significant was that (despite being a billionaire) he disproved the theory that money is king in American politics – with significantly fewer campaign resources than his opponent.

The people are fed up with crony capitalism and professional lobbyists, with media bias and collusion, with pork barrelling and paper bagging  – with the “swamp” that Trump said needed to be “drained”. So much so that they were willing to roll the dice on an outsider (even one with so many apparent flaws).

Third is the culture of political correctness, which has reached new heights in university lecture theatres and media boardrooms. While I dispute that most of those that cast their vote for Trump would privately endorse his more unsavoury views, I wage that almost all of them enjoyed his nonchalance about the verbal norms imposed by the intelligentsia and support his right to be a pig. Unlike Australia, the United States (or at least a thin majority of it) still believes in freedom of speech, including offensive speech.

These factors go part of the way to explaining the result and, while they may not be reflective of the values of New York City (where I currently write and where morale is visibly low) or those of the inner suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne, they are a still a rational and legitimate way to vote.

And yet, there are thousands of people just a few blocks from the Lower East Side apartment where I type that are assembling right now to protest the election as illegitimate. Protest is their constitutional right, but the implication is that they oppose the validity of their own democracy.

I saw this same sentiment rear its head often this past week, as those who supported Clinton and feared Trump publicly questioned whether the system needs to change and whether democracy itself is flawed.

I don’t remember these dissenters having a problem with democracy on November 4, 2008, when Americans voted very differently to elect their first African-American commander in chief.

On that historic night, millions of people around the world publicly rejoiced and the TV reporters could hardly hold back their tears. Then a student, following from the other side of the world, I’ll admit that my cheeks were also wet and salty with emotion at that time.

But many Americans were not feeling elated. They felt uneasy and dejected – nervous that their compatriots had just elected someone who would take their country in a direction they did not want. Not because he was black, but because his outlook is inherently internationalist and his trust in big government solutions is out of touch with the common folks and their culture of volunteerism.

Last Tuesday the same system that elected Barack Obama gave the other side of the culture wars a win. In four or eight years, the pendulum will likely swing back the other way, just as the founders – in their wisdom – designed.

This election is no more significant than that.

Memes and statuses comparing Trump to Hitler are shockingly disrespectful, not to Trump (who deserves all he gets) but to the victims and survivors of genocide. To compare campaign trail rhetoric to the systematic murder of men, women and children shows just how detached from reality so many commentators and consumers now are.

They also reflect a lack of historical understanding.

If Trump turns out to be a tyrant and monster – and I too fear there is a chance – the US constitution is equipped to deal with this in a way the Weimar Republic’s laws were not. This should give comfort to all of those experiencing distress.

There is much about Trump that is worrying, but far more worrying is the undercurrent of anti-democratic sentiment and lack of mutual respect that has accompanied this election. 

Mark my words, that is the fight yet to come – between those who believe the people are capable of choosing and those who believe the educated and ‘enlightened’ should make decisions on their behalf. It is a fight that will make this election look like a schoolyard scrap by comparison. 

In the meantime let us hope Trump can adopt a more statesmanlike tone and the media will at least allow him to briefly govern before judging. The cohesion of these United States depends upon it.  

Additional reading on the Rise of Trump: 


Graffiti as Manhattan comes to terms with its new president amid mass protests.

Published on 14 November 2016

Buckeye bellwether

Cleveland, Ohio

The Chicago Cubs might have narrowly beaten the Cleveland Indians to clinch the World Series last night, but it will not take Ohioans long to become distracted from the pain.

For as long as the Cubs have dwindled towards the bottom of the Major League Baseball ladder, Ohio has been what is known in as a “bellwether state” – home to voters that know which way the wind is blowing when it comes to presidential politics.

Like the Australian seat of Eden-Monaro in southwest NSW, Ohio has an uncanny knack of accurately predicting who the next US president will be. Indeed, in 25 of the 27 elections that have been held since 1904, the candidate that won Ohio also won the presidency.

Given there are only a few swing states in the country– with the vast majority being either safely blue or red – and that there is plenty of superstition surrounding Ohio ballots, both campaigns have been frequent visitors to the ‘buckeye state’ of late.

Earlier this week, I joined a couple hundred Clevelanders and fifty or so roving reporters to welcome the former Secretary of State to town. No stranger to the stump, Mrs Clinton gave a polished speech that took more than a few cues from Bernie Sanders’ campaign, focusing on her student loan debt reduction plan and the shortcomings of her opponent.

But while her supporters probably left buoyed – even inspired – by the up close and personal event, there is no doubt their enthusiasm paled in comparison with that of a different political crowd gathering across town.

About a mile out from the iX Center – Cleveland’s largest convention centre – the Republican nominee’s unmistakable head became visible, glaring down from a giant neon billboard alongside the five letters of his global brand: TRUMP.

Having been knocked back for a media pass (itself a telling difference between the two campaigns), I donned a ‘Make America Great Again’ cap and cautiously joined the 5,000-strong throng, paranoid I would be exposed as a pernicious, foreign journalist at any moment and ripped limb from limb.

I stood silently towards the back, fighting the urge to take notes and hoping no one would be offended by my lack of raucous cheering. The crowd whipped itself into a frenzy as the billionaire’s thick Queens accent began to boom from the stage, vigorously waving signs with slogans like “Women for Trump”, “Hillary for Prison” and “Deplorable Lives Matter” – a response to Clinton’s derogatory characterisation of Trump fans.

Partly the disparity in size and style between the two events has to do with the mundane fact that Trump’s event was primetime, Hillary’s in the afternoon.

Trump’s obvious showmanship is also a factor. I wasn’t the only one refraining from hooting and hollering, with a few other attendees likely more interested in glimpsing the candidate than voting for him (assuming they weren’t similarly cast asunder members of the press).

However, it can’t be denied it may also be a sign that Ohio is leaning Trump. In fact, Real Clear Politics has him leading Clinton by 2.7 points in the crucial state, according to the average of a number of polls taken in the past week, as do most others. Even the Huffington Post‘s poll has Trump up by half a percentage point – a publication likely to be read by very few Trump fans.

Once the global headquarters of the rubber tyre industry, in more recent times headlines about Ohio have told a sad story of economic stagnation and the decline of manufacturing (alongside occasional and very welcome sporting success).

Some have suggested this post-industrial malaise, and the joblessness it entails, is at least partly responsible for the Trump phenomenon, meaning it is no surprise he has a few natural supporters here.

Trump’s pledge to “renegotiate” the trade deals he says are responsible for factory jobs relocating overseas, as well as his more general mantra to revert national life to a previous era, resonate especially with these recently down and out folks.

His lead in Ohio heading into the final days of the campaign is all the more remarkable considering the state’s popular Republican governor John Kasich thinks so little of his own party’s nominee that he essentially donkey-voted, writing in the name of 2008 nominee John McCain instead of ticking the Trump-Pence box.

If the polls stay steady and Ohio stays true to its bellwether reputation, then there is a good chance Trump will be the next president.

But as the Chicago Cubs and their fans will be very happy to remind you, history does not always repeat itself.
Image source: Wikipedia Commons.

Published on 3 November 2016